“TO A FEW OF US here today this is a solemn and most momentous occasion, and yet in the history of our nation it is a commonplace occurrence. The orderly transfer of authority as called for in the Constitution routinely takes place, as it has for almost two centuries, and few of us stop to think how unique we really are. In the eyes of many in the world, this every-four-year ceremony we accept as normal is nothing less than a miracle.”
Ronald Reagan spoke those words at the beginning of his first inaugural address in 1981. They remain among the most profound observations ever made about democratic government.
Reagan was not speaking about himself or his victory, but about something larger: the peaceful transfer of power. What Americans regard as routine, he suggested, much of the world would see as extraordinary.
In recent months I have travelled across South Wales, to Tredegar, birthplace of the NHS, and to Merthyr Tydfil, where Keir Hardie, a Scot, was elected to Parliament by Welsh voters. It is a peculiarly British story: institutions, ideas and loyalties crossing borders within a United Kingdom that has long outlasted the individuals who temporarily speak for it.
As news of Keir Starmer’s resignation as Labour leader has prompted the inevitable arguments over his record, I find myself returning to Reagan’s words.
Supporters and critics are already delivering their verdicts. Some will welcome his departure. Others will regret it. Historians will eventually decide whether his premiership succeeded or failed.
Yet those arguments already feel secondary.
The most important event has already happened.
The Prime Minister has decided to go.
Not because he was removed by force. Not because the state collapsed. Not because constitutional order broke down. He has concluded that his time in office is over, and that someone else should take his place.
That, in itself, is often presented as the quiet strength of our system — a safety valve of democracy. But it is worth being honest about the circumstances in which that valve is used.
Prime Ministers do not leave in abstraction. They leave when authority drains away, when political capital is exhausted, and when their position becomes unsustainable. In this case, the departure follows a period in which Starmer’s leadership became steadily more unpopular, shaped by policies that failed to land with the public and a series of crises which he did not appear to master.
Initiatives such as proposals around digital identity, debates over the long-term status of Diego Garcia, and a wider sense of drift on issues such as crime and migration all contributed to a growing perception of distance between government and governed. For many voters, the government ceased to feel responsive before it ceased to exist.
That matters, because resignation is not only a constitutional moment. It is also a political judgement.
The truth is that Britain’s celebrated stability is not sustained by popularity alone, but it is also not immune to it. A Prime Minister can leave office peacefully and still have lost political control long before the formal announcement is made.
Reagan’s point still stands: compared with most of human history, this remains extraordinary. But it is not frictionless. It is the product of political failure as well as constitutional strength.
Throughout history, the great question has rarely been how leaders gain power. It has been how they lose it. Kings, dictators and revolutionary leaders have often reshaped constitutions, silenced opponents or extended their rule indefinitely in order to avoid precisely this moment.
Against that backdrop, the peaceful departure of a Prime Minister is significant. But it should not be mistaken for political success.
Britain’s constitutional order rests on a simple assumption: that no individual is indispensable. Prime Ministers come and go. Governments rise and fall. Parties enjoy their moment and then face the judgement of events. Yet the institutions of the nation endure. Parliament remains. The courts remain. The rule of law remains. The Crown remains. The country itself remains.
It is this continuity that gives democratic politics its stability.
Markets open the next morning. Civil servants return to work. Parliament continues its business. Trains run. Schools open. Life goes on. The machinery of government does not depend on any single occupant of high office.
That is not accidental. It is the point.
But there is another truth that runs alongside it. A Prime Minister is not only a temporary custodian of office; they are also accountable for whether they retain the confidence required to govern effectively. Departure, in that sense, is not just constitutional routine. It is the endpoint of political authority.
The ultimate test of democratic leadership comes at the end.
Can a leader recognise when authority has gone? Can they accept that the office matters more than the office-holder? Can they continue to lead when leadership itself is under strain?
When the answer is no, departure becomes inevitable.
This is why moments such as this deserve reflection beyond the immediate cycle of political argument. They reveal both the strength and the limits of our system: its ability to change leaders peacefully, and its requirement that those leaders retain the confidence of the country they govern.
In the coming days there will be endless arguments about whether Keir Starmer succeeded or failed. Those debates are inevitable. They are also temporary.
What will endure is something more fundamental.
A Prime Minister concluded that his authority had run its course. He announced his departure. The constitutional process began. The nation carried on.
We are so accustomed to this that we scarcely notice it. Yet much of human history suggests we should.
That is not a weakness of democracy. It is its defining strength.
Established in 2006 and celebrating twenty years, ThinkScotland is not for profit relying on donations to publish our wide range of opinions. You can subscribe to our FREE newsletter here – share and follow us on ‘X’ here – like and comment on facebook here and make a donation here. Every contribution helps to meet our overheads.
